First, for reflective activities to be effective, research by Hatcher, Bringle & Muthiah (2004) found they must be:
Structured and regular
Enable students to explore their personal values
Receive faculty feedback
Secondly, practitioners need to consider timing of the course, and student capacity (Moon, 2001). For example, a first-year student in a first-year course may not have the academic preparation and experience needed to write a thoughtful experiential research paper, but they may be prepared to write their thoughts in a journal. Correira & Bleicher (2008) have demonstrated that reflection is a skill that can be taught and developed by students over time. They recommend that faculty scaffold in reflective activities to help students build their reflective capacity throughout the semester.
Table 1: Mapping Reflection Activities
|
Pre-service
|
In-service
|
Post-service
|
Reflection alone
|
Letter to myself
Contracts
Directed readings
|
Structured journals
Directed writings
Ethical case study
Personal narrative
|
Reflective essay Experiential research paper
Portfolio
|
Reflection with others
|
Hopes and fears
Giant Likert scale
Class discussions
|
Mixed team discussion
Group activities
E-discussion
|
Team presentation
Collage or mural
Video
Photo essay
|
Reflection with community partners
|
Planning with community
Asset mapping
|
Lessons learned
Debriefing
|
Presentation to community group
Community mural
|
Table 1: I have adapted Eyler's (2001) reflection map (including some her recommended activities) and have added the activities proposed by Bringle & Hatcher (1996), and activities found on an additional web resource (see below for reference).
Reflection Maps
A helpful planning tool for faculty is to consider the reflection map developed by Eyler (2001) in which she considers three phases of reflection: before service, during service and after service, and three levels of reflection: reflection alone, reflection with classmates, reflection and with community partners. Eyler (2001) indicates that if students attend to the first six cells (see Table 1 above), and if "students have been engaged in reflection and action through the course, then students are in a position to create a more thoughtful final project" (p. 41).
Reflection Activities
When I think of reflection activities I always think back to the written journal, because, well it's an obvious choice. Luckily, Bringle and Hatcher (1999) offer a variety of multi-modal activities, other than the written journal, that faculty can use to encourage reflection. However, if you insist on the written journal, they even include five variations:
- Key-phrase journal - students must integrate a list of key words
- Double-entry journal - one side to describe, the other to link to classroom concepts
- Critical incident journal - describe and discuss a specific event from the service site
- Three-part journal - reflection framework: describe, analyze,integrate
- Directed writings - explain how course concepts/theories relate to service experience
References
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (Summer 1999).
Reflection in service learning: Making meaning of experience. Educational
Horizons, 179-185.
Correia, M. G., & Bleicher, R. E. (Spring 2008).
Making connections to teach reflection. Michigan Journal of Community
Service Learning, 41-49.
Eyler, J. (Summer 2001). Creating your reflection
map. New Directions for Higher Education, 114, 35-43.
Hatcher, J. A., Bringle, R. G., & Muthiah, R.
(Fall 2004). Designing effective reflection: What matters to
service-Learning? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,
38-46.
Moon, J. (2001). PDP Working paper 4: Reflection in
higher education learning. LTSN Generic Centre, 1-27.
No comments:
Post a Comment